jonah Posted January 10, 2015 Report Share Posted January 10, 2015 Which program is better suited to serve geographic data on the web? ArcGIS Server form ESRI or open source ? This question is common in mailing lists and GIS-forums. The most consistent answer is that depends on the project. But in this post we will see some numbers to determine which is the best software to develop an application for web mapping: GIS stacks from ESRI and OSGEO. Note the different bases of the graphic: left Linux, Windows/Linux on the right is missing! ArcGIS for Server ArcGIS for Server was launched to replace ArcIMS, and its quality and functionality is unquestionable. In a way it is based on the flagship product of ESRI ArcGIS for desktop. But it has some disadvantages as well: One ArcEditor license to configure and create data is required at least (price examples). Use the REST API, but being based on DCOM objects have scaling problems. each new API prob. means to renew the whole GIS-stack. Why is open source GIS performing better? MapServer or GeoServer run on all major operating systems (Windows, Linux, Mac OSX), ArcGIS for Server only works under Windows and Linux. “Saving” of software licenses. Satisfactory performance: for most needs the lean MapServer or GeoServer perform better than full equipped ArcGIS Server. “Recently”, in June 2012, Jennifer R. Bauer has published an interesting academic work for a Master of Science in Geography, University of Oregon, which compares three web mapping applications and GIS desktop clients: MapServer, GeoServer and ArcGIS for Server.Although all three systems returned the same number of features, attributes and metadata for the test data sets, something was strange looking at download time and file size of given datasets: The most significant differences occurred in the operation GetCapabilities between GeoServer and the other two servers. File size generated by the servers regarding the geometry type and the request described, Getfeatures are similar with minor variations, but the WFS files created by ArcServer are larger than those created by MapServer and GeoServer. download speed and file sizes of given data sets in ESRI and open source GIS products for server environment. (Jennifer R. Bauer) download speed and file sizes in ESRI and open source GIS products for server environment. (Jennifer R. Bauer) But as those requests were done by a python script we need to take a second look on the common consumer side: the Desktop GIS: Download speed and file sizes in ESRI and open source GIS products for desktop environment. (Jennifer R. Bauer) This is only one study, in other analyzes ArcGIS for Server may have better results. But mappinggis last statement is clear and we tend to support this statement: “What is clear is that there is currently a trend in the industry to replace large facilities for ArcGIS Server to Open Source solutions and not vice versa.” Source : digital-geography.com 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shin_conan Posted January 10, 2015 Report Share Posted January 10, 2015 Very nice point. beside the overprice of course. Thanks for this 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted January 10, 2015 Report Share Posted January 10, 2015 I found Boundless Geo which almost completely free, with out of the box function, pretty nice for an alternative 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mounaimGeo Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 thank youuu very interesting report 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pasfans01 Posted January 31, 2015 Report Share Posted January 31, 2015 yeah once open source gives multi-server clustering/fail over support/deployment, we will get rid arcgis server to the ground for God sake, haha, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamcarto Posted March 2, 2015 Report Share Posted March 2, 2015 you can use cartoview to work with ArcGIS Server / ArcGIS Online or OGC Services in the back end. In case you have a very simple requirement to publish geo data, you can do so directly in cartoview with apps to publish ArcGIS Server JSON and Tile layers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy Posted November 16, 2015 Report Share Posted November 16, 2015 ArcGIS Server is a professional user gis, to build intelligent and data, but also intelligent preparation.OpenGeo Suite, has a version of the public, free of charge but you have to have more effort to build up the same, and have minimal documentation and reference.This is a choice for users, which are suitable for their needs, the price and get the results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packy Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 Well - I have tried both and I chose the "commercial" way. Open source is like buying yourself a car - but you need to mount seats, stearing whell and find out which type of fuel it uses. ArcGIS and all of its online components (Server - AGOL - Portal - JavaScript web apps - Collector - AppStudio) is an awsome set of online tools that I love to play with. You have great support and funcionality that really works ... on the other hand, you have to pay for it. But it makes my life and GIS experience much easier. Packy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capricorn Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 I play with both and try to get the best from each side. Time is money, so when you put it in equation, free is sometimes more expensive then commercial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.